Article Response #9

Tens of thousands flee as Syrian regime makes Idlib push

Syrians who fled Idlib province take shelter at a camp near the Turkish border on Thursday.
(CNN)The number of civilians fleeing their makeshift homes in northern Syria is likely to be in the tens of thousands, UN officials have told CNN, as the Syrian government steps up its offensive on key rebel-held areas.
The Syrian regime, led by President Bashar al-Assad, has resumed airstrikes on rebel-held areas, such as Idlib province, where medical organizations say several hospitals and medical facilities have been hit over the past two weeks.
The officials said that around half of the civilian population of 2 million people in Idlib province had already been living in "extremely dire" circumstances before being forced to flee again in the winter cold.
    "They are particularly vulnerable as they were displaced before, and they are fleeing into areas that are extremely packed -- full to capacity -- and struggling to cope particularly now with the weather," one of the officials said.
    Idlib province, which borders Turkey, is the largest remaining rebel-held territory in Syria.
    The Syrian regime has retaken control of much of the country in the past year with the help of Russian forces and has launched an offensive to seize Idlib, the only province that came under full rebel control in the near-seven-year war.
    Idlib and other nearby rebel-held areas have been designated as "de-escalation zones" in a Russia-engineered agreement with Assad.
    Syrians who fled Idlib province travel along a road in a rebel-held area near Saraqib on Sunday.
    But violence has erupted in the province in recent weeks. Airstrikes by the regime and violence by rebels there are in violation of a truce put forward by Russia and agreed to by Assad.
    At least 23 people were killed and dozens others wounded in an explosion in Idlib on Sunday, according to Syrian activists and the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Most of those killed and wounded were fighters from al-Qawqaz, a small rebel group, according to the Observatory and the the Idlib Media Center, an anti-government activist group.
    The Observatory believes the explosion was caused by either a car bomb or a drone attack targeting the headquarters of a rebel group. Operations to recover bodies are still underway so the death toll could rise.

    'There's no water, no food'

    The Idlib Media Center activist group posted a video online of trucks carrying what appeared to be furniture and clothes that it said belong to Idlib's displaced people.
    Selim Tosun, from the IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation, warned that if regime forces seized Idlib, there would be many people already displaced who would have nowhere to go.
    He said that an estimated 100,000 civilians had fled Hama Province, next to Idlib, and headed toward the Turkish border in the past week.
    "If the strikes on civilian centers continue, there is the possibility of an additional 400,000 civilians trying to make their way to the Turkish border. This area is already saturated with people and is currently housing roughly 1 million people. The area is not a suitable living area for this many people already and to have further influx will make the situation worse," he told CNN, speaking from the center of Idlib.
    Some people arriving at the border are setting up their own makeshift tents...

    URL: http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/08/middleeast/syria-idlib-offensive-intl/index.html 
      My Response:
      • Audience- The  intended audience is the people; but possible specifically to the UN and other refugee organizations, trying to call out to them for help and also to others of the world trying to raise awareness.

      • Bias-  Being a country that we are normally familiar with this presents the already familiar information that they are a lot of refugees that are trying to find a way to escape a already violent area, which we are all familiar with Syria presenting the bias of ethos and those who already support the refugees, to convince those supporter further in supporting them.

      • Purpose- I feel that the purpose of this article was clearly obvious in which again the refugees that originally escaped Syria is then moving again and has no support, where i believe the goal was for this article to ask for help and outside people to raise awareness enabling them to be able to also help them.

      • Opinion/ connections- In my opinion, similarly to what we are learning in class at the moment with the refugees; this seems to present a similar case in which we have been trying to address in class where with all the presented  rules and laws that allow refugees certain rights, this also shows that in reality very little of these rules are yet again implemented. Another thing i would like to address is that no one is trying to do something in protecting these refugees, that this camp millions have died trying to run away from the violence that we are so unwilling to stop for the sake of the people present there. If we want to bring peace in this world we need to work together to protect those who we love, and hopefully in the future end violence.

    Comments

    1. I agree that this article was written with the purpose of raising more awareness. However, I feel like enough people are already aware of the issue and that the purpose may have also been to remind the public of how this is still an ongoing issue. I think a lot of people disregard the topic of the violence and conflict in Syria because it has been going on for so long and now the seriousness of the issue is becoming more and more faded in people's minds. I also did my article response on this topic and I think CNN did a good job on bringing in older information of the Syrian refugee crisis with this new tragedy that has occurred. BBC only focused primarily on the bomb that went off in Idlib, but it's nice that CNN gave information beyond that. I think it's crucial for certain measures to be taken because neither the government nor the rebel groups are taking into account the safety/protection of innocent civilians who aren't on either side of the issue. These people just want to live their lives in their country but are being forced to flee in fear of their lives.

      ReplyDelete
    2. I agree with Sanny that this article serves as a reminder that the refugee crisis isn't a thing of the past. As Amy stated, I think that the purpose was to raise awareness, but I don't think that it was specifically aimed at large organizations. Entities like the UN would most likely be up to date with what is going on in Syria and probably have at least minor involvement already. The background information that is provided along with the basic facts that are presented seem to hint at an audience that is less informed about the issue. Middle to upper class non-Syrians, mainly in the West could be a very viable target as they have influence as citizens of countries that have the power to aid in the current crisis. If the population of those countries can start advocating for Syrians and other refugees, then real political change can begin to take place. The shift from xenophobia to acceptance starts with individual ideologies, and I believe that is what this article attempts to change.

      ReplyDelete
    3. Like Mia, i believe that the refugee crisis is still very prominent today and that this article does a good job of bringing that back up. I also think that The audience could be restated as maybe just people who have something to do with the refugee crisis. Perhaps people who are already involved and are wanting more info on what is going on. I agree with Sanny when she said that the conflict in Syria is greatly disregarded, and that this is a good way of showing that it still needs help. I like what Amy said about how this article shows that the rights of refugees are often overlooked and not implemented. These kind of articles always help remind me that there is so much to be done, and so little people to do it all.

      ReplyDelete
    4. I think that this article is extremely successful in reminding readers that the refugee crisis is not only ongoing right now but in many ways it is only continually getting worse and worse. Just like Mia has stated it's unlikely to be be targeted towards any large organizations as they are already aware of the current situation. Its is extremely hard for me to see these events going on and my heart goes out to those effected but I also see it as so difficult for Syrians to leave the country due to other borders and dangers only putting these refugees in less danger. And with other countries so unwilling to open their borders to refugees it only makes this situation feel more and more destitute.

      ReplyDelete
    5. As other people have been saying in their responses this article is trying to raise ongoing awareness for the ongoing situation. I think that it is aimed at the common people because of the way that it clearly outlines the Syrian conflict both at the present and in the recent past. I felt that it really did a good job at reaching out to the emotions of the reader, it really drew you in and explained the desperate need of these people.

      ReplyDelete
    6. I really like how the article summed up the background of what is happening in Syria but also added new information on what is currently going on. I agree that the main purpose is just to keep the public updated on what is happening in Syria and also to raise awareness of what is happening in and around Syria and what can be done to help or encourage others on how to help. I don't really think that the intended audience of this article is for big organizations because they most likely have their own intel within the country, so I think it is mostly just towards the public. I think that we hear about the crisis in Syria and the Syrian refugees that we, as a people, forget who these people are and we forget that they are people just because of the far-hearted news reports and statistics. I think that reading articles like these we need to look at it like we are reading about real people and real lives, which we are.

      ReplyDelete
    7. I thought that the article gave a good amount of information about the crisis that is going on and that it did a good job of explaining this. I found it to be a very factual article not addressing the emotion of the audience, and think that the reason was to not make people just caught up in the emotion but in the facts. I agree with what has been said about the audience for this article being the public and I think it could possibly could be addressing Middle aged people.

      ReplyDelete
    8. I also agree with the others in that this article did a really good job in giving a background because it would inform those who are not completely familiar with this situation. I feel a bias for the rebels and the displaced people coming from the writer because the writer mentions a lot of things about the people, rather than the ones who are causing this problem. This article is mostly for the public people, like Natalie said. It is really bringing this problem into the light and is making people more aware of the ongoing problem. It makes me really sad to think about how so many people are being displaced and forced away from their homes because of the violence. I think that this article may also be calling out to the other countries to help these people more as they are continually being scared away from the violence.

      ReplyDelete
    9. I have to agree with what the people before me have said. The article was presented in a way that caused us to empathize with the refugees. The purpose was not only to give people information about the on-going crisis, but also to remind and reinvigorate the ones who have forgotten that the world needs to help Syria. Even though ISIS is quickly being defeated, the lives of the people in Syria do not seem to be improving yet and being here and realizing that we have so little to give really makes me sad. It seems that no matter how many rules we create to make the world a better place, the only rules that people adhere to are the ones that benefit them and ignore the ones that don't and war is the foremost representation of this evil.

      ReplyDelete
    10. I felt that this article gave a good overview of the situation and did a brilliant job of appealing to the ethos of the reader. As I read it my heart really went out to the refugees caught up in the crisis. Like others have said, I think the targeted audience was probably just the general public since the situation was explained so clearly. I think the purpose of the article was simply to inform people of the current situation and to raise awareness as it gets worse and worse.

      ReplyDelete
    11. I agree with what Krista had to say that yes, it is articles like this that shows that there are areas that we need to work together on to try and resolve this issue, and that the things in this article present a cause where many sadly ignored. And as Sanny has also stated this issue has been there for a long time, but it's this little things such as bombings that then they start to pay attention to which i agree with Sanny and David and my heart does go out to these people and its very hard to see. And i also think Natalie did a good job in stating that they i do a great job in summarizin the syrian events.. an i hope that as the years more will be one to help these people rather than just awareness of the situation.

      ReplyDelete
    12. I would agree with Sanny in how this article is more informational based than opinion based. It is true that this is a serious topic, but definitely has been addressed for a while and there are many different views on the topic. It is difficult to keep the seriousness of this topic at hand, as a result of the situation continuing for so long, often as humans we find ourselves watering down the situation and making the issue less serious. The Author seemed to strain towards being against the bombing of Iblib. The targeted audience would be the people that are interested in the current world today and the problems that it entails. Looking at this situation with little knowledge I would go against the bombers of the story since they are usually the bad guys.

      ReplyDelete
    13. I think that this article does a good job of representing the situation in Syria fairly. It seems like they do a good job of not using really emotionally loaded words to charge the reader against one organization or another in Syria, but rather they seem to focus more on the side of raising empathy towards the refugees of Syria. So rather than inciting the readers to anger at one side or another, the article seem more to draw the readers into the lives of the refugees including bolded quotes like "No food, no water" emphasizing the dire nature of the situation rather than the issues with how it came to be.

      ReplyDelete
    14. I would agree with Amy and Krista, the Syrian refugee crisis is huge, even today. I think refugee are seen in a different light, in some ways they are seen as outsiders, and many people want to keep them out. We should ban together, and be one. One that cares about the lost people, for people that are hurting, and in need of help. we shouldn't put them off and shove them to the curb, We should be who God called us to be. He called us to go and share with love to everyone, even refugees.

      ReplyDelete
    15. I agree with those before me that this conflict is still an issue, and this article helps remind us of that but also provides a good update. Does this attack show how the president Assad is regaining control of the country? I haven't seen any maps on how the areas of control are divided, how many rebel-held areas are left? This article helps to empathize with the refugees and asks the question of what will happen to them next and calls for a response.

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment