Article Response #15

Syria conflict: Putin orders Eastern Ghouta 'humanitarian pause'

  • 1 hour ago

Russia's President Vladimir Putin has ordered a daily pause in the assault by its ally, the Syrian government, on the rebel-held Eastern Ghouta area.
It will start on Tuesday, and include the creation of a "humanitarian corridor" to allow civilians to leave.
The rebel enclave near Damascus, where 393,000 civilians are trapped, has been under intense bombardment by government forces with Russian support.
More than 550 people have been killed in eight days, a monitoring group says.
Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu made the announcement about the "humanitarian pause", saying it would run from 09:00 until 14:00 local time (07:00-12:00 GMT) daily.
He said more details on the corridor would be released soon.
The United Nations Security Council unanimously called for a nationwide 30-day cessation of hostilities on Saturday.
The resolution demanded that "all parties cease hostilities without delay" to allow aid deliveries and medical evacuations.
Russia had been accused of delaying the UN vote for several days by asking for changes to be made to the draft.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has described the situation in the Eastern Ghouta as "hell on Earth", and demanded immediate action.

What is the aim of the UN resolution?

The UN resolution applies to the whole of Syria, although the focus is on stopping government attacks on the Eastern Ghouta.
Rebels in the enclave would also have to stop firing shells into government-controlled Damascus, an act that has also killed civilians.
The resolution allows operations against groups that the UN regards as terrorists - including the jihadist groups Islamic State (IS), al-Qaeda and associated entities - to continue.
On Sunday, air strikes by a US-led multinational coalition against IS killed at least 10 civilians in the eastern province of Deir al-Zour, according to activists.

What is happening now in the Eastern Ghouta?

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based monitoring group, said 31 people have been killed in the enclave since UN resolution passed.
On Monday, 17 people were killed in air and artillery strikes on the towns of Douma and Harasta, it said.
The Syria Civil Defence, a rescue organisation whose volunteers operate in a number of rebel-held areas, said nine civilians had been killed in a strike on one building in Douma.
Casualties were also reported following what the opposition newspaper Enab Baladi reported was a ground offensive by pro-government forces that rebels repelled.



The official Sana news agency meanwhile cited police as saying a civilian had been injured in the government-controlled Qassa area of Damascus by shells fired by Eastern Ghouta rebels.

Was there a chlorine attack on Sunday?

Ambulance drivers reported a chlorine smell after a bombardment air strike in the town of al-Shifuniya.
Workers within the opposition-run health ministry said there had been admissions on Sunday of people suffering symptoms consistent with exposure to chlorine gas.
They said 18 people had been treated "with oxygen nebulising sessions", that one male infant had died, and that a four-month-old baby was on a ventilator.
It was unclear whether the boy's death was related to gas or the explosion.
The Syrian American Medical Society, a relief organisation, also told the BBC there were patients "suffering from symptoms indicative to exposure to chemical compounds".
None of reports could be independently verified.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Monday that "bogus stories" about the use of chlorine were a "provocation" intended to sabotage the UN resolution.
The Syrian government has repeatedly denied using chemical weapons.
However, a joint investigation by experts from the UN and the Organisations for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons concluded two years ago that government forces had used chlorine as a weapon at least three times between 2014 and 2015.
The experts are also confident that government forces used the nerve agent Sarin in an attack on the northern rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun last April, killing more than 80 people.

URL: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43200956

    My Response:
    • Audience- I feel like the audience that this article was intended to be towards is the public and to the Syrian people addressing that they are allowed to leave because they are afraid of losing more lives that would not only effect the economy, but also these people are just losing lives and they aren't even in the conflict. As well as anyone that may be affected 

    • Bias-  There is some bias that could be possibly be that since this news network is British they may have some bias towards Syria and the war in general as well as towards the people who are attacking them, and showing the effects that they are doing to the citizens and trying to bring their sense of humanity.

    • Purpose- I feel that the purpose of this article was to attack and show the negativity and negative effects through the use of ethos persuasion to showcase the terrors that these rocket attacks have had on Syria. 

    • Opinion/ connections- In my opinion, when i first saw this article i was very happy to see that people have lately been trying to at least do something to try and keep the citizens happy, and safe, and i am happy that the UN is finally being involved and intervening in the situation where they can now have a concrete plan to evacuate the citizens rather than illegally escaping. As the weeks go by the war is only getting worse and more people are being in between the crossfires including children. Which now that i think about it find it very sad that people aren't willing to  see and think about the effects that these boiled over conflicts have on its citizens and the environment around them. So now it has to reach. the point where the people have to leave their own homes that they grew up in that idea just makes me both mad and very sad.



Comments

Post a Comment